Home / Research / Systems Reform

Systems Reform

The mental health system itself is in crisis. Understanding these structural challenges is essential for positioning technology appropriately—as an adjunct, not a solution.

The Crisis by the Numbers

160K+
mental health provider shortage
HRSA, 2024
160M
Americans in shortage areas
HRSA HPSAs
23+ hrs
average psychiatric ED boarding
ACEP, 2023
97%
reduction in state psych beds since 1955
TAC

The Workforce Shortage

The United States faces a severe and growing shortage of mental health professionals across all categories.

Provider Type Current Supply Projected Need Estimated Shortage
Psychiatrists ~45,580 55,000+ ~10,000
Psychologists ~113,000 140,000+ ~27,000
Clinical Social Workers ~330,000 450,000+ ~120,000+
Total Mental Health Various Various 160,000+

Source: Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), 2024 projections

Geographic Disparities

The shortage is not evenly distributed:

  • 160 million Americans live in designated Mental Health Professional Shortage Areas (HPSAs)
  • Rural areas have 1/3 the psychiatric workforce of urban areas
  • 60% of counties have no practicing psychiatrist
  • Average wait time for new psychiatric patient: 25+ days (some areas 3+ months)

Contributing Factors

Training Pipeline

Not enough residency slots. Medical schools prioritize other specialties.

Reimbursement

Mental health pays less than other specialties. Insurance barriers persist.

Burnout

50%+ of mental health workers report burnout symptoms.

Where Technology Can Help

Position
Technology cannot create more providers. But it can extend reach (telehealth), reduce burden (automated assessments), support training, enable task-shifting, and improve measurement.

Psychiatric Boarding

"Psychiatric boarding" refers to patients held in emergency departments (EDs) while waiting for inpatient psychiatric beds. It represents one of the most acute failures of the mental health system.

The Reality

Patients in psychiatric crisis wait in fluorescent-lit emergency department hallways— sometimes in restraints, without specialized psychiatric care, for hours or even days.

The Numbers

23+ hours
average boarding time nationally
ACEP, 2023
5+ days
extreme cases documented
Various reports
300%
increase in pediatric boarding since 2019
AAP, 2022
60%
ED staff report decreased care quality
ACEP surveys

Why It Happens

  • Bed shortage: US has ~11 psychiatric beds per 100,000 (vs. 50+ in 1960s)
  • State hospital closures: 97% reduction in state beds since 1955
  • Insurance barriers: Authorization delays average 4-6 hours
  • Geographic mismatch: Beds may exist but not locally
  • Specialty needs: Beds for specific populations (pediatric, forensic) scarcer

Consequences

For Patients

  • Symptom worsening in non-therapeutic environment
  • Trauma from restraints and lack of privacy
  • Medical complications from lack of psychiatric care
  • Delayed treatment when time matters

For Emergency Departments

  • Capacity consumed by boarding patients
  • Staff burnout and moral injury
  • Reduced care quality for all patients
  • Financial strain

Solutions Showing Promise

Crisis Stabilization Units

Short-term alternatives to ED and inpatient. 23-hour observation.

Mobile Crisis Teams

Meeting patients in community, avoiding ED entirely.

Telepsychiatry in ED

Faster psychiatric evaluation, reducing decision time.

Bed Registries

Real-time visibility into bed availability across regions.

Crisis Receiving Centers

Dedicated non-ED intake points for psychiatric crises.

Peer Support in ED

Reducing distress during waits with lived experience.

Community Mental Health

The CCBHC Model

Certified Community Behavioral Health Centers (CCBHCs) represent a scalable model for comprehensive community mental health. Created by federal legislation in 2014 and expanded since, CCBHCs must provide:

Crisis services (24/7)
Screening, assessment, diagnosis
Person-centered treatment planning
Outpatient MH & SUD services
Primary care screening
Targeted case management
Psychiatric rehabilitation
Peer support services
Services for veterans

Evidence from CCBHC Evaluations

60%
increase in persons served
SAMHSA evaluation
12%
reduction in ED visits
SAMHSA evaluation
18%
reduction in hospitalizations
SAMHSA evaluation
↑
improved access for underserved
SAMHSA evaluation

Where Technology Fits

CCBHCs could benefit from:

  • Tele-expansion: Reaching more people without physical expansion
  • Measurement-based care: Systematic outcome tracking
  • Care coordination: Integrated health records
  • Peer support scaling: Technology-augmented peer services
  • Crisis support: Digital tools between contacts

International Models

UK: Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT)

The NHS IAPT program is the largest implementation of evidence-based psychological therapy in the world.

Structure

  • Free at point of care (NHS funded)
  • Self-referral (no GP gatekeeping required)
  • Stepped care model (low → high intensity)
  • Measurement-based care (PHQ-9, GAD-7 every session)
  • National standards for access and outcomes

Outcomes

  • 1.5+ million people treated annually
  • 50%+ reliable recovery rate
  • 65%+ reliable improvement rate
  • Average wait time reduced to 6 weeks

Lessons: Stepped care can work at scale. Measurement matters. Self-referral increases access. Low-intensity options expand capacity.

Australia: Headspace

Headspace focuses on youth mental health (12-25 years) through integrated centers.

Model

  • Over 150 centers nationally
  • Integrated MH, physical health, alcohol/drugs, vocational
  • Youth-friendly environments
  • Online services (eHeadspace) for remote access

Evidence

  • High acceptability to young people
  • Early evidence of symptom reduction
  • Challenges with severe presentations

Lessons: Youth-specific design matters. Integration improves engagement. Digital extension increases reach.

Netherlands: Stepped Care

The Netherlands pioneered stepped care for mental health in primary care settings.

  • Clear levels of care intensity
  • Start at lowest appropriate level
  • Step up based on non-response
  • Technology integrated at multiple levels

Evidence: Comparable outcomes to specialist care for common disorders. More efficient use of specialist resources.

Technology as Bridge, Not Solution

Core Position
Technology alone cannot fix the mental health system. But it can serve as a bridge—extending reach, reducing burden, maintaining continuity, and supporting (not replacing) human connection.

Where Technology Bridges

Between Sessions

Digital tools maintain momentum between provider contacts.

Before Care

Screening and preparation improve efficiency of clinical time.

During Waits

Support during access gaps (but not substituting for care).

After Discharge

Continuity and relapse prevention post-treatment.

Geographic Gaps

Telehealth extends reach to underserved areas.

After Hours

Crisis support when providers unavailable.

What Technology Cannot Bridge

Severe mental illness: Requires intensive human intervention.
Active crisis: Technology alone is dangerous.
Therapeutic relationship: Cannot be digitized.
Complex presentations: Require clinical judgment.
System failures: Technology cannot create beds or providers.

Key References

American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP). (2023). Psychiatric boarding survey report.

Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA). (2024). Health workforce projections: Behavioral health.

NHS England. (2024). Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) outcomes data.

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). (2023). CCBHC demonstration evaluation findings.

Treatment Advocacy Center. (2016). Going, going, gone: Trends and consequences of eliminating state psychiatric beds.